Wisconsin
This page provides a breakdown of all major developments and right to counsel law that the NCCRC knows for this state, sorted by subject area. Click on either tab below to see the aspect it describes.
| Color Key | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Categorical Right To Counsel | There is a right to counsel without qualification for all indigent individuals in this type of case (except that the individual may be required to request counsel). |
| Discretionary Appointment Of Counsel | Courts are permitted but not required to appoint counsel for any indigent individual in this type of case. A request may be required. |
| Right Or Appointment Is Qualified | The established right to counsel or discretionary appointment of counsel is limited in some way, including: the only authority comes from a lower/intermediate court decision or a city government, not a high court or state legislature; a case has cast doubt on prior authority; a statute is ambiguous; or the right or discretionary appointment is not for all individuals or proceedings within that type of case. |
| No Such Proceeding | This state has no law creating a judicial proceeding of this type. |
| No Authorization, But Relevant Materials | While this state does not provide for or require appointment of counsel with respect to the given subject area, it does have something (such as a report or bar policy) that supports the right to or appointment of counsel for this subject area. |
| Other | Because the "Other subject areas” category can include developments from different subject areas that do not work the same way as each other, a blanket categorization of this category is not possible. |
Abuse/Neglect/Dependency - Accused Parents
Legislation
While a state may have many statutes, court decisions, or court rules governing appointment of counsel for a particular subject area, a "Key Development" is a statute/decision/rule that prevails over the others (example: a state high court decision finding a categorical right to counsel in guardianships cases takes precedence over a statute saying appointment in guardianship cases is discretionary).
Discretionary appointment of counsel
Courts may appoint counsel for parents in CHIPS cases.
If "yes", the established right to counsel or discretionary appointment of counsel is limited in some way, including any of: the only authority is a lower/intermediate court decision or a city council, not a high court or state legislature; there has been a subsequent case that has cast doubt; a statute is ambiguous; or the right or discretionary appointment is not for all types of individuals or proceedings within that category.
Appointment of Counsel:
discretionary
Qualified:
no
Litigation
While a state may have many statutes, court decisions, or court rules governing appointment of counsel for a particular subject area, a "Key Development" is a statute/decision/rule that prevails over the others (example: a state high court decision finding a categorical right to counsel in guardianships cases takes precedence over a statute saying appointment in guardianship cases is discretionary).
Discretionary appointment of counsel
The WI Supreme Court held that courts must make a case-by case determination of whether to appoint counsel in abuse/neglect cases.
If "yes", the established right to counsel or discretionary appointment of counsel is limited in some way, including any of: the only authority is a lower/intermediate court decision or a city council, not a high court or state legislature; there has been a subsequent case that has cast doubt; a statute is ambiguous; or the right or discretionary appointment is not for all types of individuals or proceedings within that category.
Appointment of Counsel:
discretionary
Qualified:
no
Pilot
Wisconsin takes step towards right to counsel for parents
04/04/2018
A new 2018 law creates pilot programs that provide a right to counsel for parents in CHIPS cases in 5 counties.
Abuse/Neglect/Dependency - Children
Legislation
While a state may have many statutes, court decisions, or court rules governing appointment of counsel for a particular subject area, a "Key Development" is a statute/decision/rule that prevails over the others (example: a state high court decision finding a categorical right to counsel in guardianships cases takes precedence over a statute saying appointment in guardianship cases is discretionary).
Right to counsel
Children over the age of 12 have a right to counsel in certain abuse/neglect cases, but appointment is otherwise discretionary.
If "yes", the established right to counsel or discretionary appointment of counsel is limited in some way, including any of: the only authority is a lower/intermediate court decision or a city council, not a high court or state legislature; there has been a subsequent case that has cast doubt; a statute is ambiguous; or the right or discretionary appointment is not for all types of individuals or proceedings within that category.
Appointment of Counsel:
categorical
Qualified:
yes
Adult Protective Proceedings - Protected Person (incomplete)
Legislation
While a state may have many statutes, court decisions, or court rules governing appointment of counsel for a particular subject area, a "Key Development" is a statute/decision/rule that prevails over the others (example: a state high court decision finding a categorical right to counsel in guardianships cases takes precedence over a statute saying appointment in guardianship cases is discretionary).
Right to counsel
There is a right to counsel for the subject of an adult protective proceeding.
If "yes", the established right to counsel or discretionary appointment of counsel is limited in some way, including any of: the only authority is a lower/intermediate court decision or a city council, not a high court or state legislature; there has been a subsequent case that has cast doubt; a statute is ambiguous; or the right or discretionary appointment is not for all types of individuals or proceedings within that category.
Appointment of Counsel:
categorical
Qualified:
no
All Basic Human Needs
Legislation
Wisconsin legislature creates access to civil legal services study committee
04/18/2016
The Wisconsin legislature created a study committee to examine how to expand access to counsel in civil cases.
|
NCCRC supported the prior petitions to the Court urging it to expand access to counsel. |
Litigation
While a state may have many statutes, court decisions, or court rules governing appointment of counsel for a particular subject area, a "Key Development" is a statute/decision/rule that prevails over the others (example: a state high court decision finding a categorical right to counsel in guardianships cases takes precedence over a statute saying appointment in guardianship cases is discretionary).
Discretionary appointment of counsel
The WI Supreme Court held that trial courts have the inherent power to appoint counsel in any civil case.
If "yes", the established right to counsel or discretionary appointment of counsel is limited in some way, including any of: the only authority is a lower/intermediate court decision or a city council, not a high court or state legislature; there has been a subsequent case that has cast doubt; a statute is ambiguous; or the right or discretionary appointment is not for all types of individuals or proceedings within that category.
Appointment of Counsel:
discretionary
Qualified:
no
Court Rule or Initiative
Wisconsin advocates petition WI Supreme Court for right to counsel rules
09/13/2018
WI advocates have filed two petitions asking the WI Supreme Court to establish civil right to counsel rules and pilot projects.
|
|
The NCCRC testified in support of the original petition, attended Access to Justice Commission meetings that discussed the petition, and provided input on the substance of the new petition. |
Bypass of Parental Input into Abortion - Minor (Pre-Dobbs)
Legislation
While a state may have many statutes, court decisions, or court rules governing appointment of counsel for a particular subject area, a "Key Development" is a statute/decision/rule that prevails over the others (example: a state high court decision finding a categorical right to counsel in guardianships cases takes precedence over a statute saying appointment in guardianship cases is discretionary).
Right to counsel
There is a right to counsel for minors seeking to bypass the parental consent requirements for an abortion.
If "yes", the established right to counsel or discretionary appointment of counsel is limited in some way, including any of: the only authority is a lower/intermediate court decision or a city council, not a high court or state legislature; there has been a subsequent case that has cast doubt; a statute is ambiguous; or the right or discretionary appointment is not for all types of individuals or proceedings within that category.
Appointment of Counsel:
categorical
Qualified:
no
Civil Contempt in Family Court
Legislation
While a state may have many statutes, court decisions, or court rules governing appointment of counsel for a particular subject area, a "Key Development" is a statute/decision/rule that prevails over the others (example: a state high court decision finding a categorical right to counsel in guardianships cases takes precedence over a statute saying appointment in guardianship cases is discretionary).
Right to counsel
There is a right to counsel for the respondent in a civil contempt proceeding.
If "yes", the established right to counsel or discretionary appointment of counsel is limited in some way, including any of: the only authority is a lower/intermediate court decision or a city council, not a high court or state legislature; there has been a subsequent case that has cast doubt; a statute is ambiguous; or the right or discretionary appointment is not for all types of individuals or proceedings within that category.
Appointment of Counsel:
categorical
Qualified:
no
Litigation
While a state may have many statutes, court decisions, or court rules governing appointment of counsel for a particular subject area, a "Key Development" is a statute/decision/rule that prevails over the others (example: a state high court decision finding a categorical right to counsel in guardianships cases takes precedence over a statute saying appointment in guardianship cases is discretionary).
Right to counsel
The WI Supreme Court found a federal (and possibly state) constitutional right to counsel in civil contempt cases where the state is a party.
If "yes", the established right to counsel or discretionary appointment of counsel is limited in some way, including any of: the only authority is a lower/intermediate court decision or a city council, not a high court or state legislature; there has been a subsequent case that has cast doubt; a statute is ambiguous; or the right or discretionary appointment is not for all types of individuals or proceedings within that category.
Appointment of Counsel:
categorical
Qualified:
no
Civil Commitment
Legislation
While a state may have many statutes, court decisions, or court rules governing appointment of counsel for a particular subject area, a "Key Development" is a statute/decision/rule that prevails over the others (example: a state high court decision finding a categorical right to counsel in guardianships cases takes precedence over a statute saying appointment in guardianship cases is discretionary).
Right to counsel
There is a right to counsel for indigent persons for various types of civil commitment proceedings.
If "yes", the established right to counsel or discretionary appointment of counsel is limited in some way, including any of: the only authority is a lower/intermediate court decision or a city council, not a high court or state legislature; there has been a subsequent case that has cast doubt; a statute is ambiguous; or the right or discretionary appointment is not for all types of individuals or proceedings within that category.
Appointment of Counsel:
categorical
Qualified:
no
Litigation
Wisconsin case addresses right to counsel for confinement of pregnant women
10/26/2017
A Wisconsin case raised the issue of right to counsel when pregnant women are civilly committed for alleged child endangerment.
|
|
NCCRC helped frame the right to counsel component of the case and filed an amicus brief. |
While a state may have many statutes, court decisions, or court rules governing appointment of counsel for a particular subject area, a "Key Development" is a statute/decision/rule that prevails over the others (example: a state high court decision finding a categorical right to counsel in guardianships cases takes precedence over a statute saying appointment in guardianship cases is discretionary).
Right to counsel
The Wisconsin Supreme Court held there is a constitutional right to counsel for indigent respondents in civil commitment cases.
If "yes", the established right to counsel or discretionary appointment of counsel is limited in some way, including any of: the only authority is a lower/intermediate court decision or a city council, not a high court or state legislature; there has been a subsequent case that has cast doubt; a statute is ambiguous; or the right or discretionary appointment is not for all types of individuals or proceedings within that category.
Appointment of Counsel:
categorical
Qualified:
no
Right to counsel
A federal court recognized a constitutional right to counsel for Wisconsin civil commitment proceedings.
If "yes", the established right to counsel or discretionary appointment of counsel is limited in some way, including any of: the only authority is a lower/intermediate court decision or a city council, not a high court or state legislature; there has been a subsequent case that has cast doubt; a statute is ambiguous; or the right or discretionary appointment is not for all types of individuals or proceedings within that category.
Appointment of Counsel:
categorical
Qualified:
yes
Domestic Violence - Alleged Victim
Pilot
Wisconsin pilot finds DV rep improves outcomes, saves money
03/01/2018
A Wisconsin pilot project found that providing representation to victims of domestic violence improved personal/family safety and saved money.
Guardianship/Conservatorship of Adults - Protected Person
Legislation
While a state may have many statutes, court decisions, or court rules governing appointment of counsel for a particular subject area, a "Key Development" is a statute/decision/rule that prevails over the others (example: a state high court decision finding a categorical right to counsel in guardianships cases takes precedence over a statute saying appointment in guardianship cases is discretionary).
Right to counsel
There is a right to counsel for the subject of guardianship proceedings, but only upon request.
If "yes", the established right to counsel or discretionary appointment of counsel is limited in some way, including any of: the only authority is a lower/intermediate court decision or a city council, not a high court or state legislature; there has been a subsequent case that has cast doubt; a statute is ambiguous; or the right or discretionary appointment is not for all types of individuals or proceedings within that category.
Appointment of Counsel:
categorical
Qualified:
yes
Housing - Evictions
Legislation
All about Milwaukee's universal tenant representation program
03/27/2023
Milwaukee County has passed a resolution in support of right to counsel and appropriated sufficient funding to make that happen.
Incarceration for Fees/Fines (incomplete)
Legislation
While a state may have many statutes, court decisions, or court rules governing appointment of counsel for a particular subject area, a "Key Development" is a statute/decision/rule that prevails over the others (example: a state high court decision finding a categorical right to counsel in guardianships cases takes precedence over a statute saying appointment in guardianship cases is discretionary).
Right to counsel
There is a right to counsel for a defendant in a civil contempt proceeding.
If "yes", the established right to counsel or discretionary appointment of counsel is limited in some way, including any of: the only authority is a lower/intermediate court decision or a city council, not a high court or state legislature; there has been a subsequent case that has cast doubt; a statute is ambiguous; or the right or discretionary appointment is not for all types of individuals or proceedings within that category.
Appointment of Counsel:
categorical
Qualified:
yes
Litigation
While a state may have many statutes, court decisions, or court rules governing appointment of counsel for a particular subject area, a "Key Development" is a statute/decision/rule that prevails over the others (example: a state high court decision finding a categorical right to counsel in guardianships cases takes precedence over a statute saying appointment in guardianship cases is discretionary).
Right to counsel
The WI Supreme Court found a federal (and possibly state) constitutional right to counsel in civil contempt cases where the state is a party.
If "yes", the established right to counsel or discretionary appointment of counsel is limited in some way, including any of: the only authority is a lower/intermediate court decision or a city council, not a high court or state legislature; there has been a subsequent case that has cast doubt; a statute is ambiguous; or the right or discretionary appointment is not for all types of individuals or proceedings within that category.
Appointment of Counsel:
categorical
Qualified:
yes
Involuntary Medical Treatment (incomplete)
Legislation
While a state may have many statutes, court decisions, or court rules governing appointment of counsel for a particular subject area, a "Key Development" is a statute/decision/rule that prevails over the others (example: a state high court decision finding a categorical right to counsel in guardianships cases takes precedence over a statute saying appointment in guardianship cases is discretionary).
Right to counsel
there is a right to counsel prior to the involuntary administration of psychotropic medication.
If "yes", the established right to counsel or discretionary appointment of counsel is limited in some way, including any of: the only authority is a lower/intermediate court decision or a city council, not a high court or state legislature; there has been a subsequent case that has cast doubt; a statute is ambiguous; or the right or discretionary appointment is not for all types of individuals or proceedings within that category.
Appointment of Counsel:
categorical
Qualified:
no
Litigation
Wisconsin case addresses RTCl for involuntary treatment of pregnant women
10/26/2017
A Wisconsin case raised the issue of right to counsel when pregnant women are involuntarily treated for alleged child endangerment.
|
|
NCCRC helped frame the right to counsel component of the case and filed an amicus brief. |
Paternity - Defendant/Respondent
Legislation
While a state may have many statutes, court decisions, or court rules governing appointment of counsel for a particular subject area, a "Key Development" is a statute/decision/rule that prevails over the others (example: a state high court decision finding a categorical right to counsel in guardianships cases takes precedence over a statute saying appointment in guardianship cases is discretionary).
Right to counsel
There is a right to counsel for an indigent respondent in certain paternity proceedings.
If "yes", the established right to counsel or discretionary appointment of counsel is limited in some way, including any of: the only authority is a lower/intermediate court decision or a city council, not a high court or state legislature; there has been a subsequent case that has cast doubt; a statute is ambiguous; or the right or discretionary appointment is not for all types of individuals or proceedings within that category.
Appointment of Counsel:
categorical
Qualified:
yes
Quarantine/Isolation
Legislation
While a state may have many statutes, court decisions, or court rules governing appointment of counsel for a particular subject area, a "Key Development" is a statute/decision/rule that prevails over the others (example: a state high court decision finding a categorical right to counsel in guardianships cases takes precedence over a statute saying appointment in guardianship cases is discretionary).
Right to counsel
There is a right to counsel for tuberculosis confinement of individuals lasting more than 72 hours, but not for other kinds of quarantine.
If "yes", the established right to counsel or discretionary appointment of counsel is limited in some way, including any of: the only authority is a lower/intermediate court decision or a city council, not a high court or state legislature; there has been a subsequent case that has cast doubt; a statute is ambiguous; or the right or discretionary appointment is not for all types of individuals or proceedings within that category.
Appointment of Counsel:
categorical
Qualified:
yes
Sexually Dangerous Persons - Commitment
Legislation
While a state may have many statutes, court decisions, or court rules governing appointment of counsel for a particular subject area, a "Key Development" is a statute/decision/rule that prevails over the others (example: a state high court decision finding a categorical right to counsel in guardianships cases takes precedence over a statute saying appointment in guardianship cases is discretionary).
Right to counsel
There is a right to counsel for indigent subjects of a sexually violent persons civil commitment proceeding.
If "yes", the established right to counsel or discretionary appointment of counsel is limited in some way, including any of: the only authority is a lower/intermediate court decision or a city council, not a high court or state legislature; there has been a subsequent case that has cast doubt; a statute is ambiguous; or the right or discretionary appointment is not for all types of individuals or proceedings within that category.
Appointment of Counsel:
categorical
Qualified:
no
Litigation
Right to counsel
The WI Supreme Court held that those subjected to sexually violent person confinement have a constitutional right to counsel for their appeal.
If "yes", the established right to counsel or discretionary appointment of counsel is limited in some way, including any of: the only authority is a lower/intermediate court decision or a city council, not a high court or state legislature; there has been a subsequent case that has cast doubt; a statute is ambiguous; or the right or discretionary appointment is not for all types of individuals or proceedings within that category.
Appointment of Counsel:
categorical
Qualified:
yes
Termination of Parental Rights (Private) - Children
Legislation
While a state may have many statutes, court decisions, or court rules governing appointment of counsel for a particular subject area, a "Key Development" is a statute/decision/rule that prevails over the others (example: a state high court decision finding a categorical right to counsel in guardianships cases takes precedence over a statute saying appointment in guardianship cases is discretionary).
Right to counsel
A court must appoint a lawyer-GAL for a child in a contested adoption, and may appoint counsel.
If "yes", the established right to counsel or discretionary appointment of counsel is limited in some way, including any of: the only authority is a lower/intermediate court decision or a city council, not a high court or state legislature; there has been a subsequent case that has cast doubt; a statute is ambiguous; or the right or discretionary appointment is not for all types of individuals or proceedings within that category.
Appointment of Counsel:
categorical
Qualified:
yes
Termination of Parental Rights (State) - Children
Legislation
While a state may have many statutes, court decisions, or court rules governing appointment of counsel for a particular subject area, a "Key Development" is a statute/decision/rule that prevails over the others (example: a state high court decision finding a categorical right to counsel in guardianships cases takes precedence over a statute saying appointment in guardianship cases is discretionary).
Right to counsel
Children in termination cases have a right to a lawyer-GAL in termination proceedings.
If "yes", the established right to counsel or discretionary appointment of counsel is limited in some way, including any of: the only authority is a lower/intermediate court decision or a city council, not a high court or state legislature; there has been a subsequent case that has cast doubt; a statute is ambiguous; or the right or discretionary appointment is not for all types of individuals or proceedings within that category.
Appointment of Counsel:
categorical
Qualified:
yes
Termination of Parental Rights (Private) - Birth Parents
Legislation
While a state may have many statutes, court decisions, or court rules governing appointment of counsel for a particular subject area, a "Key Development" is a statute/decision/rule that prevails over the others (example: a state high court decision finding a categorical right to counsel in guardianships cases takes precedence over a statute saying appointment in guardianship cases is discretionary).
Right to counsel
Indigent parents have a right to counsel in contested adoption cases.
If "yes", the established right to counsel or discretionary appointment of counsel is limited in some way, including any of: the only authority is a lower/intermediate court decision or a city council, not a high court or state legislature; there has been a subsequent case that has cast doubt; a statute is ambiguous; or the right or discretionary appointment is not for all types of individuals or proceedings within that category.
Appointment of Counsel:
categorical
Qualified:
no
Termination of Parental Rights (State) - Birth Parents
Legislation
While a state may have many statutes, court decisions, or court rules governing appointment of counsel for a particular subject area, a "Key Development" is a statute/decision/rule that prevails over the others (example: a state high court decision finding a categorical right to counsel in guardianships cases takes precedence over a statute saying appointment in guardianship cases is discretionary).
Right to counsel
Indigent parents have a right to counsel in termination of parental rights cases.
If "yes", the established right to counsel or discretionary appointment of counsel is limited in some way, including any of: the only authority is a lower/intermediate court decision or a city council, not a high court or state legislature; there has been a subsequent case that has cast doubt; a statute is ambiguous; or the right or discretionary appointment is not for all types of individuals or proceedings within that category.
Appointment of Counsel:
categorical
Qualified:
no
Truancy - Petition Against Child
Legislation
While a state may have many statutes, court decisions, or court rules governing appointment of counsel for a particular subject area, a "Key Development" is a statute/decision/rule that prevails over the others (example: a state high court decision finding a categorical right to counsel in guardianships cases takes precedence over a statute saying appointment in guardianship cases is discretionary).
Right to counsel
Children in truancy proceedings only have a right to counsel in limited situations; the rest of the time it is discretionary.
If "yes", the established right to counsel or discretionary appointment of counsel is limited in some way, including any of: the only authority is a lower/intermediate court decision or a city council, not a high court or state legislature; there has been a subsequent case that has cast doubt; a statute is ambiguous; or the right or discretionary appointment is not for all types of individuals or proceedings within that category.
Appointment of Counsel:
categorical
Qualified:
yes
Other Subject Areas
Legislation
Right to counsel - expectant mothers
There is a right to counsel for expectant mothers for whom protection/services is ordered.
If "yes", the established right to counsel or discretionary appointment of counsel is limited in some way, including any of: the only authority is a lower/intermediate court decision or a city council, not a high court or state legislature; there has been a subsequent case that has cast doubt; a statute is ambiguous; or the right or discretionary appointment is not for all types of individuals or proceedings within that category.
Appointment of Counsel:
categorical
Qualified:
no
| Subject Area | Status |
|---|---|
| Abuse/Neglect/Dependency - Accused Parents | discretionary |
| Abuse/Neglect/Dependency - Children | qualified |
| Adult Protective Proceedings - Protected Person (incomplete) | categorical |
| All Basic Human Needs | discretionary |
| Benefits - Claimant | |
| Bypass of Parental Input into Abortion - Minor (Pre-Dobbs) | categorical |
| Child Support Establishment | |
| Civil Contempt in Family Court | categorical |
| Civil Commitment | categorical |
| Forfeiture (incomplete) | |
| Consumer or Other Debt | |
| Custody Disputes - Parents | |
| Custody Disputes - Children | |
| Divorce | |
| Domestic Violence - Accused Person | |
| Domestic Violence - Alleged Victim | |
| Education - Special Education | |
| Employment Discrimination | |
| Guardianship/Conservatorship of Children - Child (incomplete) | |
| Guardianship/Conservatorship of Children - Parent or Guardian (incomplete) | |
| Guardianship/Conservatorship of Adults - Protected Person | qualified |
| Health Care Access | |
| Housing - Discrimination | |
| Housing - Evictions | |
| Housing - General | |
| Immigration | |
| Issues Related to Incarcerated People | |
| Incarceration for Fees/Fines (incomplete) | qualified |
| Involuntary Medical Treatment (incomplete) | categorical |
| Paternity - Defendant/Respondent | qualified |
| Paternity - Petitioner or Child | |
| Quarantine/Isolation | qualified |
| Sexually Dangerous Persons - Commitment | categorical |
| Sexually Dangerous Persons - Registration/Notification | |
| Sterilization | |
| Termination of Parental Rights (Private) - Children | qualified |
| Termination of Parental Rights (State) - Children | qualified |
| Termination of Parental Rights (Private) - Birth Parents | categorical |
| Termination of Parental Rights (State) - Birth Parents | categorical |
| Truancy - Petition Against Child | qualified |