Matches from the Bibliographic Entries

Russell Engler, Turner v. Rogers and the Essential Role of the Courts In Delivering Access to Justice, 7 Harv. L & Pol’y Rev. 31 (Winter 2013).

Honorable David J. Dreyer, Deja Vu All Over Again: Turner v. Rogers and the Civil Right to Counsel, 61 Drake L. Rev. 639, 651 (2013).

Laura Abel, Turner v. Rogers and the Right of Meaningful Access to the Courts, 89 Denv. U. L. Rev. 805 (2012).

David J. Dreyer, Déjà Vu All Over Again: Turner v. Rogers and the Civil Right to Counsel, 61 Drake L. Rev. 639, 651 (2013).

Shane T. Devins, Using the Language of Turner v. Rogers to Advocate for a Right to Counsel in Immigration Removal Proceedings, 46 J. Marshall L. Rev. 893 (Spring 2013).

Elizabeth Patterson, Turner in the Trenches: A Study of How Turner v. Rogers Affected Child Support Contempt Proceedings, 25 Geo. J. on Poverty L. Pol’y 75 (2017).

Ashley Robertson, Revisiting Turner v. Rogers, 69 Stan. L. Rev. 1541 (2017).

Laura K. Abel, Turner V. Rogers and the Right of Meaningful Access to the Courts, 89 Denv. U. L. Rev. 805 (2012).

Tom Pryor, Turner v. Rogers, the Right to Counsel, and the Deficiencies of Mathews v. Eldridge, 97 Minn L. Rev. 1854 (May 2013).

Norman Reimer, Turner v. Rogers and the Ghost of Gagnon v. Scarpelli, 35-AUG Champion 7 (July/Aug. 2011).

Gina Rose Lauterio, Why Turner v. Rogers Wasn’t Correctly Decided: How the Fourteenth Amendment SHould be Read for Child Support Contemnors, 20 Wash. & Lee J. Civil Rts. & Soc. Just. 175 (Fall 2013).

Turner v. Rogers (Price), 564 U.S. 431 (2011).

Turner v. Rogers, 131 S.Ct. 2507 (2011) (no right to counsel in civil contempt for nonsupport of child, at least where state not prosecuting the action, opposing side not represented by counsel, and matter not especially complex).

Turner v. Rogers, 131 S.Ct. 2507 (2011) (finding no categorical right to counsel in child support-based civil contempt cases under 14th Amendment, where the plaintiff is neither the state nor represented by counsel and whether the matter is not “especially complex”).