Mississippi finally guarantees RTC for parents in abuse/neglect cases

05/13/2024 , Mississippi , Legislation , Abuse/Neglect/Dependency - Accused Parents

In 2024, Mississippi joined 39 other states in providing a right to counsel for parents in abuse matters via passage of SB 2792.  Previously, appointment was merely discretionary.  The bill also provides that the court may appoint counsel for indigent noncustodial parents who have “demonstrated a significant custodial relationship with the child.”

Miss. Code § 43-21-201(2) now states:

(2)  (a)  When a party first appears before the youth court, the judge shall ascertain whether he is represented by counsel and, if not, inform him of his rights including his right to counsel.  If the court determines that a custodial parent or guardian who is a party in an abuse, neglect or termination of parental rights proceeding is indigent, the youth court judge shall appoint counsel to represent the indigent parent or guardian in the proceeding.  The court may appoint counsel to represent a noncustodial parent if the court determines that the noncustodial parent is indigent and has demonstrated a significant custodial relationship with the child.  All parents have the right to be appointed counsel in termination of parental rights hearings, and the court shall appoint counsel if the court makes a finding that the parent is indigent and counsel is requested by the parent.  For purposes of this section, indigency shall be determined pursuant to Section 25-32-9 and Rule 7.3 of the Mississippi Rules of Criminal Procedure.

This change was a long time coming: A pilot project to provide and study representation for parents across a number of Mississippi counties ran for over a decade, and the results from the pilot helped bolster the ultimate eactment efforts.

Appointment of Counsel: Yes
Qualified: No
? If "yes", the established right to counsel or discretionary appointment of counsel is limited in some way, including any of: the only authority is a lower/intermediate court decision or a city council, not a high court or state legislature; there has been a subsequent case that has cast doubt; a statute is ambiguous; or the right or discretionary appointment is not for all types of individuals or proceedings within that category.