Washington
,
Litigation
, Civil Commitment
In Tetro v. Tetro, 544 P.2d 17, 19 (Wash. 1975), the Washington Supreme Court stated that “In proceedings civil in form but criminal in nature — such as … mental commitment hearings — representation is clearly part of due process,” and cited to Heryford v. Parker, 396 F.2d 393 (10th Cir. 1968) and Lessard v. Schmidt, 349 F. Supp. 1078 (E.D. Wis. 1972). But as Tetro did not involve civil commitment, its statement was dicta.
Appointment of Counsel: Yes
Qualified:
Yes
?
If "yes",
the established right to counsel or
discretionary appointment of counsel
is
limited
in some way, including any of: the only authority
is a
lower/intermediate court decision or a city council,
not a high court or state legislature; there
has been
a subsequent case that
has
cast doubt; a statute
is
ambiguous; or the right or discretionary appointment
is not
for all types of individuals or proceedings
within that category.