Massachusetts
,
Litigation
, Incarceration for Fees/Fines (incomplete)
In Commonwealth v. Gomes, 552 N.E.2d 101 (Mass. 1990), a defendant was jailed without a hearing after failing to pay a court fine. After holding that he was entitled to a hearing, the high court relied on Argersinger v. Hamlin, 407 U.S. 25, 37 (1972) (right to counsel for misdemeanor felonies) for the proposition that [A]bsent a knowing and intelligent waiver, no person may be imprisoned for any offense, whether classified as petty, misdemeanor, or felony, unless he was represented by counsel at his trial.”
Appointment of Counsel: Yes
Qualified:
Yes
?
If "yes",
the established right to counsel or
discretionary appointment of counsel
is
limited
in some way, including any of: the only authority
is a
lower/intermediate court decision or a city council,
not a high court or state legislature; there
has been
a subsequent case that
has
cast doubt; a statute
is
ambiguous; or the right or discretionary appointment
is not
for all types of individuals or proceedings
within that category.