Right to counsel

Colorado , Litigation , Incarceration for Fees/Fines (incomplete)

An intermediate court found a due process right to counsel for indigent litigants in civil contempt proceedings. Padilla v. Padilla, 645 P.2d 1327, 1328 (Colo. Ct. App. 1982).  It relied entirely on the threat to physical liberty, and did not clarify whether it was interpreting the state or federal constitution.  Although the case involved child support, the court spoke broadly about the right to counsel in all civil contempt proceedings.

It is uncertain whether it is still good law after the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Turner v. Rogers.

Appointment of Counsel: Yes
Qualified: Yes
? If "yes", the established right to counsel or discretionary appointment of counsel is limited in some way, including any of: the only authority is a lower/intermediate court decision or a city council, not a high court or state legislature; there has been a subsequent case that has cast doubt; a statute is ambiguous; or the right or discretionary appointment is not for all types of individuals or proceedings within that category.