Ensuring individuals have a right to effective counsel when facing the loss of their basic human needs in the civil legal system.

Plus IconMinus Icon
About Us
Mission & Vision Our Team Our Work Funders & Supporters Contact
Plus IconMinus Icon
About Civil RTC
History CRTC Champions FAQ
News
Plus IconMinus Icon
Resource Library
Status Map Bibliographies Advocacy Tools Key Issue: Tenant RTC
Get Involved
Donate
Status Map
  1. Home
  2. >
  3. No express authoirty for sterilization
Back to Status Map

No express authoirty for sterilization

Texas , Litigation , Sterilization

In Frazier v. Levi, 440 S.W.2d 393, 393–95 (Tex. Civ. App. 1969), the court held there was neither statutory nor constitutional authority for a court to authorize a sterilization.  

Appointment of Counsel: No Such Proceeding
Qualified: No
? If "yes", the established right to counsel or discretionary appointment of counsel is limited in some way, including any of: the only authority is a lower/intermediate court decision or a city council, not a high court or state legislature; there has been a subsequent case that has cast doubt; a statute is ambiguous; or the right or discretionary appointment is not for all types of individuals or proceedings within that category.
© 2003-2024 National Coalition for a Civil Right to Counsel

The NCCRC works to advance the right to counsel for low-income people in civil cases involving basic human needs, such as housing, health, domestic violence, civil incarceration, and child custody.

About Us
Mission & Vision Our Team Our Work Funders & Supporters Contact
About Civil RTC
History CRTC Champions FAQ
News
Resource Library
Status Map Bibliographies Advocacy Tools Key Issue: Tenant RTC
Get Involved
Donate
Status Map