Right to counsel

Florida, Litigation, Civil Commitment

In In re Beverly, 342 So. 2d 481, 489 (Fla. 1977), the Supreme Court of Florida has held that “The subject of an involuntary civil commitment proceeding has the right to the effective assistance of counsel at all significant stages of the commitment process.”  The court relied on Lynch v. Baxley, 386 F.Supp. 378 (M.D.Ala.1974), which in turn relied on Heryford v. Parker, 396 F.2d 393, 396 (10th Cir. 1968), a case that more clearly grounded its holding in the Due Process Clause.  Moreover, in Beaulieu v. Dep’t of Human Services, 798 N.W.2d 542 (Minn. App. 2011), the court cited to Beverly as one of the few decisions to recognize a constitutional right to counsel in civil commitment cases.

Appointment of Counsel: Yes
Qualified: No
? If "yes", the established right to counsel or discretionary appointment of counsel is limited in some way, including any of: the only authority is a lower/intermediate court decision or a city council, not a high court or state legislature; there has been a subsequent case that has cast doubt; a statute is ambiguous; or the right or discretionary appointment is not for all types of individuals or proceedings within that category.