Note, Representation in Child-Neglect Cases: Are Parents Neglected?, 4 Colum. J. Law & Soc. Problems 230 (1968).

Robyn M. Powell et al., Mental Health Legal Advisors Committee: Family Law Project Evaluation Final Report, Nat’l Research Ctr. for Parents with Disabilities at Brandeis Univ., Jan. 2020.

Vermont Parent Representation Ctr., Broken System Broken Promises Vermont Child Abuse Determination and the Child Protection Registry – A Multi-Year Analysis & Recommendations for Reform (Oct. 12, 2022).

Washington State Ctr. for Court Research, 2021 Evaluation of the Washington State Dependent Child Legal Representation Program (2021).

Washington State Office of Public Defense, Dependency and Termination Defense Pilot Project: Interim Evaluation (Jan. 2001).

Jason A. Oetjen, Improving Parents’ Representation in Dependency Cases: A Washington State Pilot Program EvaluationNat’l Council of Juvenile & Family Court Judges (2003).

University of Michigan Law School, Detroit Center for Family Advocacy Pilot Evaluation Report 7/2009-6/2012 (Feb. 2013).

Supreme Court Of Texas, Permanent Judicial Commission For Children, Youth & Families, Assessment of Appointed Representation in Texas Child-Protection Proceedings (Jan. 2011).

Steve M. Wood and Jesse R. Russell, Effects of Parental and Attorney Involvement on Reunification in Juvenile Dependency Cases, 33 Children and Youth Servs. Rev. 1730 (Sept. 2011) (examining “how involvement of mothers, fathers, and their respective legal representatives at early decision-making hearings [i.e., preliminary protective, adjudication, disposition, and first review] influences reunification in juvenile dependency cases.”).

Partners for Our Children, Washington’s Parents Representation Program Helping Children in Child Welfare System Reach Permanency, 1 Issue Brief 1 (Feb. 2011).