Jona Goldschmidt, How are Courts Handling Pro Se Litigants? Litigation by People Who Represent Themselves is a Growing Phenomenon That Presents a Variety of Challenges to Court Staff and Judges, 82 Judicature 13 (1998).
Jona Goldschmidt, The Pro Se Litigant’s Struggle for Access to Justice: Meeting the Challenge of Bench and Bar Resistance, 40 Fam. Ct. Rev. 36 (2002).
Stephan Landsman, Nothing for Something? Denying Access to Legal Assistance to Those Compelled to Participate in ADR Proceedings, 37 Fordham Urb. L.J. 273 (2010).
Bruce D. Sales, Connie J. Beck, & Richard K. Haan, Is Self-Representation a Reasonable Alternative to Attorney Representation in Divorce Cases?, 37 St. Louis U. L.J. 553 (1993) (available with HeinOnline subscription).
Richard Zorza, Discrete Task Representation, Ethics, and the Big Picture: Toward a New Jurisprudence, 40 Fam. Ct. Rev. 19 (2002).
Richard Zorza, The Disconnect Between the Requirements of Judicial Neutrality and Those of the Appearance of Neutrality When Parties Appear Pro Se: Causes, Solutions, Recommendations, and Implications, 17 Geo. J. Legal Ethics 423 (2004).
Rebecca A. Albrecht, et al., Judicial Techniques for Cases Involving Self-Represented Litigants, 42 Judges’ J. 16 (2003), available at http://www.zorza.net/JudicalTech.JJWi03.pdf.
Barrie Althoff, Ethics and the Law: Ethical Considerations for Lawyers and Judges When Dealing with Unrepresented Persons, Wash. State Bar News (Jan. 2000).
Deborah J. Cantrell, Justice for Interests of the Poor: The Problem of Navigating the System without Counsel, 70 Fordham L. Rev. 1573 (2002).
Conference of State Court Administrators, Position Paper on Self-Represented Litigation (Aug. 2000), available at https://cosca.ncsc.org/__data/assets/pdf_file/0017/23381/selfreplitigation.pdf.