Right to counsel
While a state may have many statutes, court decisions, or court rules governing appointment of counsel for a particular subject area, a "Key Development" is a statute/decision/rule that prevails over the others (example: a state high court decision finding a categorical right to counsel in guardianships cases takes precedence over a statute saying appointment in guardianship cases is discretionary).
Legislation, Truancy - Petition Against Child
In Idaho, truancy can be treated either as a status offense (pursuant to Idaho Code § 20-516(1)(c)) or as a dependency matter (pursuant to Idaho Code § 16-1602(31)(d)). If the former, the child has a right to appointed counsel if indigent pursuant to Idaho Code § 20-514(1)(a), whereas for the latter, Idaho Code § 16-1614(2)(a) specifies that the court must appoint counsel regardless of indigence for a child 12 or older, while 16-1614(2)(a) specifies that the court may appoint counsel for a child under 12 (and must appoint a guardian ad litem).
If "yes", the established right to counsel or discretionary appointment of counsel is limited in some way, including any of: the only authority is a lower/intermediate court decision or a city council, not a high court or state legislature; there has been a subsequent case that has cast doubt; a statute is ambiguous; or the right or discretionary appointment is not for all types of individuals or proceedings within that category.
Appointment of Counsel: categorical Qualified: yes