Right to counsel - unaccompanied minor
While a state may have many statutes, court decisions, or court rules governing appointment of counsel for a particular subject area, a "Key Development" is a statute/decision/rule that prevails over the others (example: a state high court decision finding a categorical right to counsel in guardianships cases takes precedence over a statute saying appointment in guardianship cases is discretionary).
in cases where a child (i) has been adjudicated dependent, (ii) found not to be a citizen of the United States, (iii) is found by the court to be eligible for "special immigrant juvenile status", and (iv) such status is in the best interest of the child, Fla. Stat. § 39.5075 requires that the "[Florida] department [of child services], or community-based care provider shall, directly or through voluntary or contractual legal services, file a petition for special immigrant juvenile status and the application for adjustment of status to the appropriate federal authorities on behalf of the child." Fla. Stat.. § 39.5075(5) (emphasis added).
If "yes", the established right to counsel or discretionary appointment of counsel is limited in some way, including any of: the only authority is a lower/intermediate court decision or a city council, not a high court or state legislature; there has been a subsequent case that has cast doubt; a statute is ambiguous; or the right or discretionary appointment is not for all types of individuals or proceedings within that category.
Appointment of Counsel: categorical Qualified: yes