Right to counsel
While a state may have many statutes, court decisions, or court rules governing appointment of counsel for a particular subject area, a "Key Development" is a statute/decision/rule that prevails over the others (example: a state high court decision finding a categorical right to counsel in guardianships cases takes precedence over a statute saying appointment in guardianship cases is discretionary).
Legislation, Guardianship/Conservatorship of Adults - Ward
N.H. Stat. § 464-A:6(I) provides that "The right to legal counsel for any person for whom a temporary guardian or guardianship of the person and estate, or person, or estate, is sought shall be absolute and unconditional." Additionally, the court "shall appoint counsel," if the proposed ward does not have his or her own counsel. However, the proposed ward "shall be liable for attorneys fees unless he or she is found indigent by the probate court." N.H. Stat. § 464- A:6(II). In In re Guardianship of Eaton, 42 A.3d 799 (N.H. 2012), the high court found that the language of § 464-A:43 (another part of the guardianship code) did not entitle the petitioner in a guardianship case to recoup attorney's fees from the ward where the petitioner acts in good faith.
The right to counsel in guardianship extends to the termination of guardianship proceeding. N.H. Stat. § 464-A:40(II)(c) ("Unless the motion is without merit, the court shall hold a hearing similar to that provided for in RSA 464-A:8 and RSA 464-A:9..."); In Re Williams, 159 N.H. 318 (2009) ("At the termination hearing, conducted in a manner similar to that of the guardianship hearing and with the ward's rights protected by counsel, the burden is on the guardian to prove that the grounds for the appointment of the guardian continue to exist, see RSA 464-A:40, II(c) ...")
If "yes", the established right to counsel or discretionary appointment of counsel is limited in some way, including any of: the only authority is a lower/intermediate court decision or a city council, not a high court or state legislature; there has been a subsequent case that has cast doubt; a statute is ambiguous; or the right or discretionary appointment is not for all types of individuals or proceedings within that category.
Appointment of Counsel: categorical Qualified: no