Right to counsel
While a state may have many statutes, court decisions, or court rules governing appointment of counsel for a particular subject area, a "Key Development" is a statute/decision/rule that prevails over the others (example: a state high court decision finding a categorical right to counsel in guardianships cases takes precedence over a statute saying appointment in guardianship cases is discretionary).
Legislation, Quarantine/Inoculation (incomplete)
The procedure for the continued quarantine of a person with a communicable disease requires that notice be provided stating that the quarantined individual has the right to counsel, including appointed counsel if indigent. N .D. Cent. Code § 23-07.6-03.
When someone known to have HIV is a danger to the public health, a state health officer may issue an order requiring that person to: be examined; report to a qualified doctor or health worker for counseling on the disease; or "cease and desist from specified conduct that endangers the health of others." N.D. Cent. Code § 23-07.4-01. The person subject to that order is "entitled to representation by legal counsel during any hearing to review the issuance of the order", but it is not clear whether this includes the right to appointed counsel if indigent. These same rights exist if the procedures under § 23- 07.4-01 are exhausted and the court orders that the individual be taken into custody. § 23-07.4-02.
If "yes", the established right to counsel or discretionary appointment of counsel is limited in some way, including any of: the only authority is a lower/intermediate court decision or a city council, not a high court or state legislature; there has been a subsequent case that has cast doubt; a statute is ambiguous; or the right or discretionary appointment is not for all types of individuals or proceedings within that category.
Appointment of Counsel: categorical Qualified: no