Right to counsel
While a state may have many statutes, court decisions, or court rules governing appointment of counsel for a particular subject area, a "Key Development" is a statute/decision/rule that prevails over the others (example: a state high court decision finding a categorical right to counsel in guardianships cases takes precedence over a statute saying appointment in guardianship cases is discretionary).
Legislation, Adult Protective Proceedings - Proposed Ward (incomplete)
Under the South Carolina Omnibus Adult Protection Act, the state may investigate adult care-giving services that are accused of neglecting or abusing vulnerable adults. During or following such investigations, the state’s Adult Protective Services Program may petition the family court for an order to provide protective services, and “[w]ithin ten days following the filing of a petition . . . , the court shall appoint a guardian ad litem and an attorney for the vulnerable adult[.]” § 43-35-45(B)-(C).
If "yes", the established right to counsel or discretionary appointment of counsel is limited in some way, including any of: the only authority is a lower/intermediate court decision or a city council, not a high court or state legislature; there has been a subsequent case that has cast doubt; a statute is ambiguous; or the right or discretionary appointment is not for all types of individuals or proceedings within that category.
Appointment of Counsel: categorical Qualified: no