Right to counsel
While a state may have many statutes, court decisions, or court rules governing
appointment of counsel for a particular subject area, a "Key Development" is a
statute/decision/rule that prevails over the others (example: a state high court
decision finding a categorical right to counsel in guardianships cases takes
precedence over a statute saying appointment in guardianship cases is
discretionary).
Court Rule or Initiative, Termination of Parental Rights (Private) - Birth Parents
A court rule requires appointment of counsel for indigent parents in adoption cases where 1) the parents have Indian children; 2) the adoption alleges that the parents commited sexual assault/abuse resulting in the conception of a child and termination is in the best interests of the child; 3) any adoptions seeking to bypass the consent requirements.
If "yes",
the established right to counsel or
discretionary appointment of counsel
is
limited
in some way, including any of: the only authority
is a
lower/intermediate court decision or a city council,
not a high court or state legislature; there
has been
a subsequent case that
has
cast doubt; a statute
is
ambiguous; or the right or discretionary appointment
is not
for all types of individuals or proceedings
within that category.
categorical
no
