Right to counsel
Litigation, Sexually Dangerous Persons - Commitment
In State ex rel. Seibert v. Macht, 627 N.W.2d 881 (Wis. 2001), the court found that a person adjudicated to be sexually dangerous had a right to appointed counsel in their by-right appeal (there is a statutory right to appointed counsel for the trial). The court relied upon the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353, 357-5 (1963), which had held that states providing a by-right appeal in criminal cases had to provide appointed counsel for that appeal, and the Seibert court went on to hold, "[a]lthough a sexually violent person, committed under Chapter 980, is not a criminal defendant, he or she has the same constitutional rights as a criminal defendant … It therefore follows that an individual committed under Chapter 980 has a constitutional right of counsel in bringing his or her first appeal as of right, emanating from both the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause and Due Process Clause as well as the Sixth Amendment's right of counsel."
If "yes", the established right to counsel or discretionary appointment of counsel is limited in some way, including any of: the only authority is a lower/intermediate court decision or a city council, not a high court or state legislature; there has been a subsequent case that has cast doubt; a statute is ambiguous; or the right or discretionary appointment is not for all types of individuals or proceedings within that category.
Appointment of Counsel: categorical Qualified: yes