Right to counsel
While a state may have many statutes, court decisions, or court rules governing appointment of counsel for a particular subject area, a "Key Development" is a statute/decision/rule that prevails over the others (example: a state high court decision finding a categorical right to counsel in guardianships cases takes precedence over a statute saying appointment in guardianship cases is discretionary).
Legislation, Quarantine/Inoculation (incomplete)
An indigent person required to be isolated, quarantined of tested under a public health order (Alaska Stat. §§ 18.15.355-18.15.395), is entitled to be represented by an attorney. Alaska Stat. § 18.85.100(a). The attorney shall be provided at the public’s expense if paying for the attorney services and facilities and court costs would cause undue hardship to the indigent person. Alaska Stat. § 18.85.100(b).
If "yes", the established right to counsel or discretionary appointment of counsel is limited in some way, including any of: the only authority is a lower/intermediate court decision or a city council, not a high court or state legislature; there has been a subsequent case that has cast doubt; a statute is ambiguous; or the right or discretionary appointment is not for all types of individuals or proceedings within that category.
Appointment of Counsel: categorical Qualified: no