Texas decriminalizes truancy, adds appointment of counsel provision
While a state may have many statutes, court decisions, or court rules governing appointment of counsel for a particular subject area, a "Key Development" is a statute/decision/rule that prevails over the others (example: a state high court decision finding a categorical right to counsel in guardianships cases takes precedence over a statute saying appointment in guardianship cases is discretionary).
06/18/2015, Legislation, Truancy - Petition Against Child
In 2015, a new law went into effect that decriminalized truancy (Texas was only one of two states that made a truancy a crime). The bill was bolstered by a report from Texas Appleseed analyzing the problems with the Texas truancy law. Among other things, the law noted that
[I]ndigent children who go to juvenile courts are entitled to appointed counsel, whereas children sent to the JP and municipal courts are not appointed counsel. More often than not, in JP and municipal courts, children are faced with having to appear, plead, present defenses, and advocate for themselves without any legal representation, and often with little to no review of the rights guaranteed to them, what the pleas mean, and the consequences associated with each. This is an especially difficult process for children with special education needs, who represent 1 out of every 8 FTAS cases filed … These children are responsible for making their own decisions about how to plead and how to defend themselves in court, without court-appointed counsel. Courts, including the U.S. Supreme Court, have repeatedly recognized that assistance of counsel is especially important for children, as they are particularly vulnerable to the complicated and coercive nature of the criminal justice process. Yet, in JP and municipal courts, children go unrepresented by counsel unless they hire their own.
Under the new law, children can only be subjected to non-fine/jail remedies at first, rather than a Class C misdemeanor, and parents charged with contributing to truancy are now subject to fines rather than a Class C misdemeanor. The bill also adds required truancy prevention measures, such as creation of behavior improvement plans, community service, counseling, mentoring, or a teen court program. And it prevents referral of a child to truancy court if certain reasons (homelessness, pregnancy, foster care, or employment) are responsible for the truancy. Aa child subsequently found in contempt of a truancy court order can only be fined $100, or alternatively, have their driver's license suspended; the child cannot be jailed in these truancy court proceedings until they have repeated instances that result in a referral to a juvenile court for a delinquency prosecution.
There is also a provision relating to appointment of counsel for these truancy court proceedings. Tex. Fam. Code 65.059 now states:
(a) A child may be represented by an attorney in a case under this chapter. Representation by an attorney is not required.
(b) A child is not entitled to have an attorney appointed to represent the child, but the court may appoint an attorney if the court determines it is in the best interest of the child.
If "yes", the established right to counsel or discretionary appointment of counsel is limited in some way, including any of: the only authority is a lower/intermediate court decision or a city council, not a high court or state legislature; there has been a subsequent case that has cast doubt; a statute is ambiguous; or the right or discretionary appointment is not for all types of individuals or proceedings within that category.
Appointment of Counsel: discretionary Qualified: yes