Right to counsel
While a state may have many statutes, court decisions, or court rules governing appointment of counsel for a particular subject area, a "Key Development" is a statute/decision/rule that prevails over the others (example: a state high court decision finding a categorical right to counsel in guardianships cases takes precedence over a statute saying appointment in guardianship cases is discretionary).
Legislation, Sexually Dangerous Persons - Commitment
For commitments of sexually dangerous persons, there is a right to counsel under the general civil commitment law, see Minn. Stat. § 253B.02 subd. 17(b) (applying civil commitment code, including right to counsel in Minn. Stat. § 253B.07 subd. 2c, to “A person committed as a sexual psychopathic personality or sexually dangerous person as defined in subdivisions 18a and 18b”), and also a separate right to counsel specified in Minn. Stat. § 253D.20 (“A committed person has the right to be represented by counsel at any proceeding under this chapter. The court shall appoint a qualified attorney to represent the committed person if neither the committed person nor others provide counsel.”)
If "yes", the established right to counsel or discretionary appointment of counsel is limited in some way, including any of: the only authority is a lower/intermediate court decision or a city council, not a high court or state legislature; there has been a subsequent case that has cast doubt; a statute is ambiguous; or the right or discretionary appointment is not for all types of individuals or proceedings within that category.
Appointment of Counsel: categorical Qualified: no