Right to counsel
While a state may have many statutes, court decisions, or court rules governing appointment of counsel for a particular subject area, a "Key Development" is a statute/decision/rule that prevails over the others (example: a state high court decision finding a categorical right to counsel in guardianships cases takes precedence over a statute saying appointment in guardianship cases is discretionary).
Legislation, Incarceration for Fees/Fines (incomplete)
Md. Code Crim. Proc. § 16-204(b)(1)(iv) specifies that an indigent defendant shall be provided representation by the Public Defender in "any  proceeding in which confinement under a judicial commitment of an individual in a public or private institution may result."
Md. Rules R. 15-206(3) provides some guidance on how waiver of the right to counsel should be handled.
If "yes", the established right to counsel or discretionary appointment of counsel is limited in some way, including any of: the only authority is a lower/intermediate court decision or a city council, not a high court or state legislature; there has been a subsequent case that has cast doubt; a statute is ambiguous; or the right or discretionary appointment is not for all types of individuals or proceedings within that category.
Appointment of Counsel: categorical Qualified: yes