Right to counsel
While a state may have many statutes, court decisions, or court rules governing appointment of counsel for a particular subject area, a "Key Development" is a statute/decision/rule that prevails over the others (example: a state high court decision finding a categorical right to counsel in guardianships cases takes precedence over a statute saying appointment in guardianship cases is discretionary).
Legislation, Quarantine/Inoculation of Individual
The requirements for isolation and quarantine are set out in the Code of Massachusetts Regulations at 100 C.M.R. 300.200, 210. There is a right to appeal an order of isolation or quarantine to the Superior Court, but no right to counsel articulated. 105 C.M.R. 300.210(F)(2).
For tuberculosis specifically, a person with active tuberculosis subject to a petition for commitment to a tuberculosis treatment center may request a hearing and if it is "...determined that the person cannot be present because of his condition, he must be given notice of this fact and of his right to have counsel and witnesses present at the hearing. In the latter case, the court shall appoint legal counsel to represent the person’s interests at the hearing if he does not have his own legal counsel." M.G.L. ch. 111, §94C(1).
If "yes", the established right to counsel or discretionary appointment of counsel is limited in some way, including any of: the only authority is a lower/intermediate court decision or a city council, not a high court or state legislature; there has been a subsequent case that has cast doubt; a statute is ambiguous; or the right or discretionary appointment is not for all types of individuals or proceedings within that category.
Appointment of Counsel: categorical Qualified: yes